We’re back with our “thinking about thinking” series! If you’re interested in our previous deep thoughts, check out the Metacognition series. Join us for some deep thoughts (and maybe the occasional not-so-deep thought) about gaming. If you find one you’d like to answer, you can either comment below or write a post and share the link so we can all read your fantastic thoughts.
Is there an inherent difference between a game critique and a game review?
By definition, it seems like these two are very similar, with a critique defined by the Oxford dictionary as “a detailed analysis and assessment of something, especially a literary, philosophical, or political theory,” and a review is defined as “a formal assessment of something with the intention of instituting change if necessary.”
Both appear to be appraising “something” in one way or another. And sometimes I think these words are used interchangeably. But I don’t think they are precisely the same thing. I think back to when I would audition for orchestras, or participated in a master class. I was often critiqued – the person was an expert in the field, and the feedback was often very technical and objective. Compare this to a review, in which a person gives their subjective opinion on a topic, possibly with the hopes that something about it will be changed.
The key difference is that critiques are, at their heart, more objective and technically based, with (usually) an expert in the field applying their knowledge to the task. A review, on the other hand, is another assessment, but can be much more subjective and, therefore, written by anyone.
If you peruse AmbiGaming, you’ll see some reviews. While I might offer some criticism about a game, or point out a few flaws I found, I am, shockingly enough, not an expert in any sort of field that pertains to the design of games.
On the whole, though, I think most of the time, “reviews” of video games flirt with both being a true “review” and a critique. I think of folks I’ve come across on YouTube who work within the industry who critique games, and even those have hints of review bits in them. There is always something subjective that comes up when talking about a theory, story, or product produced by another person. So I ask…
Are critiques and reviews of games inherently different? Do you prefer reading reviews or critiques? Or are they the same thing? Let me know in the comments!
Thanks for stopping by, and I’ll see you soon!
Do you like what you’ve read? Become a revered Aegis of AmbiGaming and show your support for small creators and for video games as a serious, viable, and relevant medium!