The Interesting Impressions of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

This article is part of our Year of the RPG. You can read more about our Witcher 3 adventures here.

Another first impressions post? Yes, well, all will be described below, but over 60 hours in and I am waving my little white flag with The Witcher 3. Not forever, so you might see this game be revisited during Year of the RPG: The Two Years… At any rate, here we go.


Released in 2015, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is an action-RPG developed by CD Projekt Red. As its name implies Witcher 3 is the third in a series of Witcher games, and is the sequel to the aptly-named The Witcher 2: Assassin’s of Kings released in 2011. But the Witcher has a longer history than even the 2007’s original The Witcher. The main character, supporting characters, and events in the games are based loosely on the novel series of the same name by Polish author Andrzej Sapkowski, in which our protagonist, Geralt of Rivia, is a specialized monster-hunter with a surprisingly realistic personal life.

White Orchard_48.jpg

Enter the games, and so far, so good. This is not a comparison of the games to the books (especially since I have not read them), so without further ado, let’s get to the game versions of Geralt’s adventures.

The Premise

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt takes places after the events of the first two games, for which I am at a disadvantage as I’ve never played them. I’m sure the game attempted to explain what happened to me in bits and pieces, but like most RPGs, I found myself overwhelmed by information and, without prior familiarity with the series, could only grasp at straws as I tried to master the combat and leveling system.

The plot itself is fairly straightforward, even if the path to its conclusion isn’t. Geralt’s adopted daughter, Ciri, is missing, and after a somewhat prophetic dream, Geralt tries to find and rescue her. Along the way he runs into some old (for him)/new (for me) friends and lovers, and then we are on familiar ground in the land of RPGs, balancing personal and professional lives while trying to make progress on the main story without getting too bogged down in sidequests that relate to the main story in an adjacent (at best) or tertiary (at worst) way.

As a sidenote, I also liked that there was a color-blind option in the menu. Well done with inclusivity, CD Projekt Red!

Main Menu_2.jpg

Overall, I find the story compelling, even if at its core it’s “rescue the princess.” The variation the rich world of the Continent provides to this familiar tale is enough to keep anyone interested and invested for hours, with some fans boasting over hundreds of hours of play duration. After all, in how many “rescue the princess” tales do you get to then play as said princess, and completely steamroller your enemies with relative ease, making the princess seem much more adept than the man trying to save her?


Throw in an old witch who performed a spell to make herself look young forever just because she can, a fiery redhead with a good heart (yes, I realize I have a problem), and an all-around memorable and colorful cast, and the player can’t help but be drawn into the beautiful and rich world of The Witcher.


My first impression was that I ran face-first into a learning curve. The camera never seemed to behave itself, I fumbled through using the different swords that equipped automatically a moment before I hit the button that would send them back to their sheathes, and boy, it took me a good hour before I noticed the level suggestions for each quest.

Once I got my feet under me, as it were, I found the controls to be responsive and the movements fluid, which was very nice after being spoiled by the likes of Shadow of Mordor. I was intrigued by the fact that this is an RPG, because like some of the more modern RPGs I’ve been playing, The Witcher 3 has you roleplay as a particular character, and therefore the player builds stats more than a character.


But like any good RPG, The Witcher 3 has plenty of opportunities to shape the world around you, and sometimes in very important ways. We’re talking influencing geo-political landscapes, here. And there is no right or wrong, but rather nebulous decisions that affect outcomes of storylines, be they main or side-quests.

I enjoyed this nuanced choice system, since it did help the player shape Geralt into the type of Witcher they wanted him to be (even if it boiled down to “nice guy” or “stone cold”), and the player could switch between one tone or another without impacting experience points. I always appreciate this in a game because it lets players experience the grey areas that people often exist in, and also react to the things going on around them (e.g., “I’ve said yes to so much before this. Enough already.” and etc.). I also enjoyed when there was a countdown timer, because you had to decide quickly and, you know, Geralt wouldn’t look like he suddenly went comatose after being asked a question.

Whispering Hillock_2.jpg

Along with plot choices were all the choices involved in the romance side-quests. Yennifer, Geralt’s old flame, and Triss, Geralt’s old friend, are so different from each other yet love Geralt in their own ways, and it is up to you, The Player, to navigate Geralt’s love triangle. Normally, I couldn’t abide such a situation, but the way the game handles the situation is not ham-handed, and really makes it seem like there is a complex web of history that ties everyone together in somewhat confusing ways, which was fun and interesting to see.

I also really enjoyed that the game occasionally switched between playing as Geralt and Ciri. Honestly I enjoyed playing as Ciri a bit more, because she seemed like such a badass (ahem) and I really wanted to know more about her story. I suppose if I got further into the game, I’d have gotten my wish, but…

Hierarch Square_53.jpg

Geralt’s story has a lot going for it, for sure, but it wasn’t all rain and griffins during this experience. After all, there was a reason that this is, after so much time, a “first impressions” post.

Tripping Over a Small Step

I’ve mentioned before that timing is everything, and it’s possible that this was a case of bad timing. However, The Witcher 3 suffers from having an incredibly slow start… Around 10 hours in, I was not particularly invested in the story or any of the characters other than Ciri who had barely made any appearances, and I didn’t particularly like Geralt. If it weren’t for all the rave reviews and the fact that it was a Year of the RPG game, I might have quit playing it.

Having said that, I did find the story to be engaging and interesting after a while, and once that occurred I wanted to see the story to the end. But unfortunately, that brings me to another point that I found very irritating.


When I played Skyrim, one of the things I liked was that it was designed for a person to build a life as they saw fit. For me, that meant following the civil war and becoming the leader of a guild, and that was fine; my Ra’zirr was able to make his life how he wanted it, and if it weren’t for Year of the RPG I probably would have kept exploring, since the game really did feel like “building a life,” rather than telling a solid story.

With The Witcher 3, there was a definite story arc that the player was to experience, except the game seemed to get confused every once in a while and think that it was Skyrim with a solid story. I decided that I wanted to mostly play the main quests, and only pick up side quests as they interested me. Unfortunately, the game had other plans.

The only way I can say this is that it was sidequests inside sidequests inside sidequests. Once I understood that each of the main quests had suggested levels, I also realized that meant I would be sidequesting, which is about par for a RPG. But within the sidequests, I often found I was sent on a further sidequest.


For instance, I was trying to bring a character out of hiding (first-level sidequest) in order to advance a main quest I had been on. I reported to the person to complete the sidequest, and was sent on another quest from them (second-level sidequest), which by itself had three parts. Alright. Annoying, but still within RPG parameters. However, upon going on the second-level sidequest, I was send on another quest (third-level sidequest). After completing third-level sidequest, it was back to second-level to complete part two, complete with another third-level sidequest. Then to part three, with another third-level sidequest. Back to first-level sidequest, only to discover that there was one more thing I had to do.

Rinse and repeat.

By the time I was done with the sidequest, I had forgotten what the main story quest was.

But I put my time in, and trudged along. What caused the final shut-off,  though, was when it seemed like we were finally getting to the end game, and I was sent on a side-quest, only to be sent on a secondary quest for a character I had already secondary-quested for.

Screw that. Sorry, Geralt, you’re on your own.

Yeah, how ’bout “no”?

I looked online, and it appears that the culture that has sprung up around The Witcher 3 is one of a smug “Oh, you have to play the game for at least 150 hours before it really opens up…” “150? You noob, I’ve dumped at least 270 hours in and I haven’t reached the final act yet.”

If there is one thing I can’t stand surrounding a game, it is pretentiousness. But that’s not what this review is about.

The (Not So Final) Showdown

All in all, I progressed to the end of the second act, when the characters began preparing to defend Kaer Mohren. When I was sent to collect on all the debts of people I had helped, I was met with more sidequests-in-sidequests. By this point, I was over 85 hours ito the game, and just wanted the plot. Like Lucid Path before it, I was tired of the pacing long before the game ended. Unlike Lucid Path, there seemed to be no end in sight.


It’s possible, as I mentioned, that I just played this at a bad time, and was perhaps not wanting a “forever” game. This is one that I will be revisiting, because I do want to see the end eventually, but the game did seem to want to force the player to see every single part of their clever game, and so designed the quests with the time-sinks in mind so the player would do just that.

Conclusion and Overall Impressions

The Witcher 3 has a lot of great points, and is overall a good game with nice mechanics. It had a bit of a slow start, and tended to drag in the middle, but the story is overall interesting. The characters are great, as well, even the one-and-done NPCs that Geralt comes across throughout his adventure.

Honestly, I think this game might be best suited as a “slow burn” game: one that you play in the backgroud while you make progress on other games. It’s definitely not one for people looking for a tight story, but has enough going for it to appeal to Witcher fans, or to folks who enjoy action games with RPG elements.

Have you played The Witcher 3? What did you think about it? Did the sidequests drag on and on, or am I missing the point? Did you think there should be more Ciri, all the time? Let me know in the comments!

Thanks for stopping by, and I’ll see you soon!

Do you like what you’ve read? Become a revered Aegis of AmbiGaming and show your support for small creators and for video games as a serious, viable, and relevant medium!


  1. I’ve immensely enjoyed the whole experience in Witcher 3: Wild Hunt when I played it about two years ago, as well as all the DLC CD Projekt Red released. I even took the time to do about 80% of the side quests. What I’ve really appreciated is that for the most part, a lot of them actually tie into the story of this game and its predecessors, instead of being a few activities copy pasted all over the place. The story and characters are excellent as well. The game does take a considerably long time to get through, and I’ve not been able to really dive back into it ever since my first playthrough (my 2nd I stopped at around 60 hours in like you have) and a bit of its magic is lost once you’ve beat the game once. That said, personally it’s my favorite game of all time, although my gaming experience has only covered years 2010-present in gaming and I’ve missed quite a few excellent console exclusives as I game on PC.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for commenting!! (And sorry for the delay.) I agree that the sidequests are unique and don’t fall into the trap of being thinly-disguised fetch quests over and over and over again, and they each do contribute to and help build the world Geralt lives in. I can definitely see why it gets the love that it does! It’s completely possible that when I return to it with fresh eyes I will feel differently about it.

      That is a very specific range of years for gaming! Did you choose the last decade for a reason, or did you just start getting into gaming in 2010?


      1. Yeah i only started gaming around 2010 when I got my first gaming PC built, though played a bunch of games in the 2005-2010 range as well. Now because there’s always so many games coming out between major triple A and indie releases that I never really had a chance to do any retro gaming. With writing about games on my blog too I usually never have time to go back to older games before 2010 and to be frank, I don’t seem to enjoy them either whenever I tried. A few mobile ports of games like Grand Theft Auto i play now and then but my main gaming decade seems to be largely 2010-present.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. Very cool. And I hear you when it comes to having a deluge of new games all the time…. in a way it’s a good problem to have, but it does make replaying games more difficult…

          At any rate, I’m glad to have you along for the ride and am looking forward to seeing your insights in the comments!


          1. Thanks! Great to see you try to engage with all your readers and commenters, it can be very hard to do that with a busy schedule! Feel free to check out my gaming blog ( as well if you’re interested. I do more discussion on gaming as well as write reviews for video games that interest me. Cheers!

            Liked by 1 person

  2. I liked The Witcher 3, much like its predecessors, for everything apart from the actual “RPG” part. The dialogue, the character interactions, the narrative? All golden. The combat? A pain in the arse. And in The Witcher 3 we add a whole open world to that mix too, a significant proportion of which is boring muddy swampland.

    I’d much rather it have been a more straightforward adventure game — perhaps with a few combat sequences to spice things up — than the sprawling monstrosity it ended up being. That didn’t stop me playing it through to completion, mind you — and anyone telling you you need “at least 150 hours” to beat it is talking out their arse, since I beat the main story and the two expansions within less than 100 hours in total — but I came away from it kind of wishing it had been something else.

    And I’m speaking at someone who will happily plough 100+ hours into a grindy JRPG. The dissonance between what The Witcher 3 was trying to do with its narrative and what it was actually doing with its structure and mechanics was just a little too great for me to think of it as anything more than “quite good” though.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. You and I are of one mind when it comes to the RP part of RPGing, I think! haha There is a lot to love in Witcher 3, for sure, and like I mentioned to Vlad Shepard above, I’m sure when I get back into it with fresh eyes I’ll like it more and see it to the end. I think Witcher, like Inquisition (to a different degree) fell into the trap of “trying to be like Skyrim, but…” having a real story to tell, which muddied the storytelling waters.

      I’m glad I’m not the only one thinking the 150 hours minimum is a little ridiculous! haha But you have a point that the balance of narrative and mechanics was not ideal, regardless of its merits. “Quite good” isn’t a bad game, after all 🙂

      As always, thanks for your insights. I always enjoy reading what you have to say about games.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Slow burn would be the right way to play this game! I’ve been treating it like an MMORPG (which is designed to keep you running around so they keep getting your subscription fee every month). I’ve been binge-playing it until I get bored, then switching to a short game so I remember what it’s like to actually beat a game. I love Geralt’s character! He so sarcastic and just seems sick of everything. I can relate and enjoy spending time with him, haha.

    Also, I’ll say things get really interesting after Kaer Mohren. Ciri is indeed a badass.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Ah, maybe I’ll have to slow burn it in the background, then. I tend to like to play a game until completion, so I’ll have to adjust my internal settings, if this is indeed the case!

      Good to keep in mind… More Ciri = always better, in my opinion! haha

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I do try to solely stick with something until completion, but all these massive open world games take a toll on my short attention span, haha. I find just taking a break from them with a shorter game helps me a lot! Otherwise I start to resent the game and end up never finishing it.

        Yep! And definitely add talking about the Witcher 3 after you beat it to the list of things I want to babble to you about…. 😁

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s