Me, You, and WHO: Gaming Disorder Breakdown

Gaming addiction. It’s a topic we’ve talked about a few times before, and one we’re going to talk about again. Why?

Well, it’s more like “who,” and by WHO, I mean the World Health Organization.

Related image

For those of you who might not know, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recently rolled out a beta definition for the new “gaming disorder” diagnosis that will be included in the new International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), set to be released this year, if I’m not mistaken.

And if gamers aren’t all atwitter, chips firmly on shoulders.

Image result for twitter

Some have tentatively spoken about being glad people who truly have a problem being able to seek the help they need, and others, well, didn’t. I noticed that, underneath all of the woe-is-us and everyone-is-out-to-get-gamers and the like was real fear as to what this might mean for our hobby, or for the medium in general.

Fear not, hypothetical person who might be feeling this way. We are going to take a look at some of the hype surrounding this diagnosis, and then take a look at the actual diagnostic criteria and talk about what those words on the page mean, and why you shouldn’t be afraid of them.

Seeing Double

For those of you who read this article about how to not pathologize play, you know that I have an “it’s complicated” relationship with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM5). But this is where we need to start. In the most recent fifth edition, the DSM5 includes “internet gaming disorder” as a “condition for further study.” What this means is that clinicians technically can’t diagnose people with this disorder, but the American Psychiatric Association thinks it might be a viable diagnosis that needs further research before they can determine whether it is actually “bad enough” to be a diagnosis.

Image result for research
It’s needed.

So, it’s open to change, and more research will hopefully inform a diagnosis that doesn’t harm the folks who partake in games healthfully, in the same way that people who are sad for a few days aren’t diagnosed with major depressive disorder.

But what about the WHO’s definition? Well, although the definition itself is in its beta stages, the diagnosis is going to be included in the next ICD as a proper diagnosis that can be used by medical professionals. This is contrary to the DSM, which is basically alerting people that, “hey, guys, this might be a problem so we’re going to research it more.” The DSM seems like it’s leaving room for error, whereas the ICD definition is about to be rolled out. It’s time to face the music, gamers, it seems to say. This is a real issue and we’re not tip-toeing around.


Another consideration is that the DSM is pretty much only a “big deal” in the world of psychology, but the ICD is not only a manual used worldwide, but it is used by both psychology and medical fields. The take-away message from this is that it’s incredibly important that the ICD get their diagnoses right.

But, as usual, it’s not so simple.

Dissention in the Ranks

Perhaps one of the best arguments I can give in favor of even having this diagnosis available is that there are research psychologists like Douglas A. Gentile who started off wanting to disprove the idea that gaming disorders exist, only to be surprised by their studies to find that, yes, gaming can potentially be a problem for some people. Others hope that, by having the diagnosis be “real,” it will start a conversation that people don’t want to have, and spark research that people might not otherwise want to conduct.

While that can be putting the cart before the horse, I wonder if making the diagnosis official will force researcher to try and clean up the conflicting research that already exists.  After all, if research finds that there is no possible way for gaming to be a disorder, the diagnosis will disappear. It has happened before (look up homosexuality in the DSM-II if you don’t believe me).*

ST dancing.gif
And we’re all very happy about that.

Another potential benefit that Gentile suggests is that by making gaming disorder “real” in the ICD, it will not only start conversations and research about it, but will also start the ball rolling on developing treatments for people who might be affected.

On the other hand, the APA has already fumbled the ball a bit when it comes to connecting video games with violence, saying that the connection is clear when in fact anyone who takes the time to read the research (or any of the articles I’ve been posting on the topic) knows that the connection isn’t quite as cleanly cut as that. Another issue that I’ve heard raised is that gamers were not included.

Image result for not amused

Sorry, guys. The average gamer should not be included in any sort of official capacity here. I took to Reddit with this topic, and, while a few people did mention that if it was a problem for some then there should be research and treatments available, most people did not approach the topic with the type of objectivity that research really requires.* Just because you or I don’t personally know anyone with a gaming problem, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Just like if you or I don’t personally know someone with an alcohol problem, it doesn’t meant that doesn’t exist, either.

This, in my mind, is like saying that because I do not have autism spectrum disorder, I cannot be qualified to research it, or that I can’t tell the difference between a slight deviation from the norm and a deviation that is having a profound/negative impact on a person’s life. I’m going to sound a little salty here, but researchers really aren’t “out to get” the population they’re researching. They want to know more so clinicians can help. If data are there, researchers will find them.

But I digress.

Image result for of course you did

Chris Fergusen, another psychology professor, opines that gaming disorder isn’t any different from any other behavioral addiction, but rather it’s simply a manifestation of a deeper issue. As with any addiction, it’s rare that the behavior/substance use starts by accident (although that can happen). Sometimes people fall into addictive behaviors because they are trying to cope with something else, either a mood disorder, or a stressful life event, or any other reason that pushes them to self-regulate in an extreme way. Of course we need to treat the underlying issue for long-term success, but if the immediate behavior is a problem, that needs to be addressed, too.

And, anyway, a person’s behavior is going to be indicative of these deep issues. If we don’t recognize when a behavior becomes a problem, those deeper issues will go un-diagnosed and untreated.

I don’t know about you, but to me that doesn’t seem very fair to the person who needs help.

What It’s Not

As happens when psychology meets popular culture/the internet, this diagnosis has taken on a number of strange characteristics as its name is whispered like a contagious disease, or shouted as a condemnation of “non-gamers.” So let’s take a few that I’ve seen and work through them.

Gaming disorder is not…

…obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This is one of those diagnoses that people misuse upon themselves and others all the time. Have you heard something like this before? “I made a shopping list organized by food group because I’m so OCD.”

Image result for shopping list

No, no you’re not. That’s called organization.

When a person has OCD, they experience uncontrollable, recurring thoughts and behaviors that they feel compelled to repeat over and over. This is not the same as wanting to play a video game all day and night.* The most “famous” example is an obsession with germs, resulting in hand-washing to a harmful point, like skin turning red and cracking open. The person may feel a brief relief from their obsessive thoughts when they perform the behavior, but get no enjoyment out of the behavior itself, unlike folks who may be addicted to a video game.

Gaming disorder is not…

…emotion regulation disorder. This one is just silly, because emotion regulation is the ability of a person to control (or “regulate”) their emotional responses in response to external or internal stimuli (things happening outside your body or thoughts inside your head). Basically what having an emotion regulation disorder means is that a person reacts in an out-of-proportionate way to whatever is happening. A slight setback at work might result in sobbing or extreme anger, etc.

Image result for anger gif

This one has popped up a few times, so I think people are trying to say that gaming disorder is a symptom of anxiety or depression. But no, gaming disorder is not secretly anxiety or depression, nor a problem with “emotional regulation.”.

Of course, one thing this diagnosis is not, is harmless. Like any diagnoses, there is the potential for overdiagnosis, which gamers who can function just fine, perform their daily lives, and aren’t experiencing any ill effects being dragged to the doctor by concerned family members because they spend 5 hours on Saturday playing a game instead of binge watching Netflix. But over-diagnosis is a prevalent issue nowadays, anyway, especially when it comes to behaviors that people might think are inconvenient to themselves, but that’s not a rant I’m going to start on here.

What It Is

The problem with all of the above thoughts is that psychology is messy and made of shades of grey, and the differentiation is made on the smallest details sometimes. For instance, any addiction could be considered to have some obsessive components, as the person thinks about their addiction of choice when not partaking in it. Likewise, there is an emotional component to addiction, as the addictive substance or behavior helps a person feel better. But these are not OCD or emotion regulation disorder, these are symptoms within a larger – and unique – whole.

Image result for puzzle

Some people don’t believe behavioral addiction is a real thing. I disagree, pretty forcefully, actually, but there’s a certain detail in there that is important. People aren’t addicted to a behavior, they are addicted to the feeling the behavior gives them, which is caused by a chemical… Except the chemical is caused by a behavior, not an external substance, so…

This might seem like a mundane detail, but is actually very important. This is the line between a gamer being a regular ol’ gamer and someone with an addiction problem. It’s the difference between someone who plays the lottery every so often and someone with a gambling problem.

Related image

Unfortunately, it can be a fuzzy line. Is someone who drinks everyday, but is functioning, addicted, or is the person who never drinks and then gets blackout-hammered once a month the one with the problem?

Is someone who plays game everyday, to the detriment of a social life, addicted, even if by all other accounts they are functioning and content, or is should we send help to the one who only games on the weekend, during which they lock themselves in their residence, close the blinds, and don’t eat or shower for two days before returning to work on Monday, no worse for the wear? Or, do either of them have a problem at all?

These are not answers that I have.

And this is why the ICD and DSM are trying to pinpoint exactly where the line for The Problem begins. Let’s take a look at what they have to say.

The Criteria

The ICD-11 Beta Draft lists gaming disorder under the parent heading “Disorders due to addictive behaviors,” and reads as such:

Gaming disorder is characterized by a pattern of persistent or recurrent gaming behaviour (‘digital gaming’ or ‘video-gaming’), which may be online (i.e., over the internet) or offline, manifested by: 1) impaired control over gaming (e.g., onset, frequency, intensity, duration, termination, context); 2) increasing priority given to gaming to the extent that gaming takes precedence over other life interests and daily activities; and 3) continuation or escalation of gaming despite the occurrence of negative consequences. The behaviour pattern is of sufficient severity to result in significant impairment in personal, family, social, educational, occupational or other important areas of functioning. The pattern of gaming behaviour may be continuous or episodic and recurrent. The gaming behaviour and other features are normally evident over a period of at least 12 months in order for a diagnosis to be assigned, although the required duration may be shortened if all diagnostic requirements are met and symptoms are severe.

Let’s break this down:

Gaming disorder is characterized by a pattern of persistent or recurrent gaming behaviour
— easy enough to understand

manifested by: 1) impaired control over gaming (e.g., onset, frequency, intensity, duration, termination, context)

— This wording is odd, and was lifted out of the gambling addiction section if the ICD, but the spirit of this is that a person feels compelled to play games. This is the inexorable, driving desire to perform the behavior

2) increasing priority given to gaming to the extent that gaming takes precedence over other life interests and daily activities;

— This is the “it’s taking over your life” bit of addiction

Image result for the blob

and 3) continuation or escalation of gaming despite the occurrence of negative consequences. The behaviour pattern is of sufficient severity to result in significant impairment in personal, family, social, educational, occupational or other important areas of functioning.

— You keep doing it even though there are clear indicators of the behavior harming your life (bills not paid, eschewing self-care tasks, etc.)

The pattern of gaming behaviour may be continuous or episodic and recurrent.

— This is an attempt to define a fuzzy line with another fuzzy line, but this is the same criteria for gambling. To judge from its use in gambling, this is meant to give “case by case” freedom to the mental health professional.

The gaming behaviour and other features are normally evident over a period of at least 12 months in order for a diagnosis to be assigned, although the required duration may be shortened if all diagnostic requirements are met and symptoms are severe

— Like any addiction, it needs to go on for a while, unless it’s really bad in the short-term (e.g., ask yourself if you would suggest a friend seek help if they lost $5000 gambling, but “it’s only been two weeks.”).

The Bottom Line

Some people might say that having a “gaming disorder” puts the blame on the behavior, and not the deeper issues that drive the behavior/addiction. I disagree. While I admit I am not an expert in addiction, from what I know, addiction is “giving” a person something they need; this can be a (misplaced) feeling of control because the substance/behavior starts off as something they can choose to do or not, or it can be a much-needed chemical boost, or it could be pure escapism from something terrible happening in one’s life.

Image result for stress

But this is like saying diagnosing someone with depression is putting an emphasis on the symptoms of lethargy, low mood, and low energy, rather than the underlying cause of the depression. We can only understand what is going on in the brain by the behaviors it commands the body to do.

To think that any diagnosis is simply a sum of behaviors is misguided at worst and dangerous at best. I might not know a lot about addiction, but I do know about behavior modification, and while a harmful behavior must be addressed to stop the immediate harm, the behavior must be addressed in conjunction with the reason that is driving the behavior. This is the only way to hope for any sort of long-lasting effect.

Image result for relief

So, gamers, don’t be afraid of this new diagnosis. It has a firm foundation, and more research is being conducted. This is just a way for people who need help to understand that they need help, and seek it without being ridiculed for self-diagnosing an imaginary problem. Sure, it’s scary, because gaming is still misunderstood as a hobby, but that doesn’t mean people who need help shouldn’t receive it, just because of our insecurities.

What do you think? Do you have concerns about this new diagnosis? Or are you confident in the mental health professionals handling this? Let me know in the comments!

Thanks for stopping by, and I’ll see you soon,
~ Athena
**This article has some extra content available on Patreon**

(if you can believe that I went on even longer than I already did…)

What’s next? You can like, subscribe, and support if you like what you’ve seen!

– Support us on Patreon, become a revered Aegis of AmbiGaming, and access extra content!

– Say hello on FacebookTwitter, and even Google+!
– Check out our Let’s Plays if you’re really adventurous!


  1. Great read! So I have played over 40 hours of Monster Hunter in the first week of its release, which some might label as addictive. But, it doesn’t detract from me doing my job, or having a relationship with my partner or friends. I have just been hammering away at it in my free time, as opposed to reading or watching shows. It’s tempting even for me to call this “addiction” – but I have to remind myself that true addiction would cause me to lose control of my life.

    So gamers, if you’re worried about this classification, don’t be. If you’re riled up because you have the kinds of behaviors expressed here where you regularly neglect important aspects of your life because of gaming, then, well – that’s why this was written in the first place.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. There really is a lot that goes in to any sort of addiction, and that’s exactly why. If it’s not having a seriously negative effect on your life, is it really a “problem”? All hobbies take time, but it whether it starts *destroying* you life that really matters.

      Thank you for the well-phrased summary!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. That was a fantastic read! And I am glad the article went on for as long as it did, it was a proper guide through the issue.

    I wonder, what are your thoughts on binge-gaming?

    If I may go on two tangents:
    1) You mentioned a pet peeve of mine: talk of OCD as if it meant “oh geez, I am extremely tidy and/or quirky”. Come on, people. It isn’t cute. 😕
    2) I just read an article about smartphones and their correlation to the decline of Gen Z’s mental health. I feel like, as far as media coverage and scares go, online life could very well end up being to that generation what videogames were to Gen X and Gen Y.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. I… try not to have thoughts on binge-gaming outside of my own head. I don’t know enough about addiction to really take a solid stand, although like I said, if it’s something that happens a lot and really starts to mess up your life, that’s a problem. I binge-played Dragon Age: Origins over three days, and played through the Mass Effect trilogy in two weeks… but I also kept my grades up, went to work, and performed all the other adult tasks I had to do. I mean, I was tired, but it was fine. The games ended and things went back to normal. Is that a problem? I’m not sure I’m qualified to say.

      1) No mental disorder is cute, and it bothers me when people think it is.

      2) This is something I do have an opinion on and I actually agree that it could be a problem. Before constant news/social media/etc., bad things would happen but we’d read about it in the paper the next day. Now, it’s instant, *and* we are also exposed to reactions of – let’s face it – the loudest and usually most negative folks out there. That can really wear on a person. And there are already studies talking about how technology is shortening attention spans, and even potentially having a negative effect on dedication to difficult or time-consuming tasks. So if I had to “pick a side” I’d actually come down more on the side of this is a very strong possibility.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Thank you for your honest answer. And apologies for half-baked question!

        My uninformed/layperson opinion would be that I agree with you on the smartphone issue. Social media and online interactions can be stressful enough for adults who supposedly have more tools and skills at their disposal to deal with any possible problem. Regarding the shortening of attention spans, there is a really neat and short interview El País conducted with Catherine L’Ecuyer that went viral last week. If you’d like I can send you the link to that (or to the article I mentioned in the first comment).

        With all that said, after that interview went viral, some less serious media started speculating wildly, which reminded me of the old violence in videogames debate.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. I’m always happy to read more articles, so you can certainly send one or both my way!

          I have a pretty pessimistic view of the media. Now that news is 24-hours, they need to fill that time with something *and* keep people interested so they don’t switch channels, which makes for spectacles surrounding things that really… aren’t that spectacular.

          Liked by 1 person

  3. This was a great article!!! the whole idea and science behind a ‘gaming addiction’ disorder has always facinated me as I’ve been playing video games all my life and its really been the closest thing ive had to a hobby for quite some time now. Its great to see this topic more coverage and to get conversations about it started so more people can learn and understand this sort of stuff, me included.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thank you for stopping by and commenting!

      I’m so glad you enjoyed the read! You’re right that there just needs to be more information out there so everyone, including us, can understand the psychology that goes into gaming as a hobby. I’m looking forward to seeing how thing go from here, that’s for sure!

      Hope to see you again soon!


  4. Loved reading this!! You rock at the psychology stuff 🙂

    Sadly, a lot of gamers freak the f out whenever any “official” says something “negative” about video games. These people need to chill. They are NOT doing the video gaming hobby any favors by raging at everyone. I have read about cases of MMO addictions that have lead to destructive behaviors, including suicide. Gaming addiction absolutely needs to be researched more, and maybe these people can get the help they need someday, if it is discovered to be an issue. There seems to be a lot of fuzzy lines, but more unbiased (keyword) research is always a good thing in my book!

    And I know I escape to the land of games when I’m feeling down, lost in real life, and/or angry. It’s an escape that always makes me feel better. If that’s an addiction, call me an addict, haha. Now if you’ll excuse me… *runs off to read Patreon notes*

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Yeah, definitely. I’d wonder why people on both sides of the aisle think games are just so different from everything else that they need to start digging the ol’ war trenches every time someone says something critical to their point of view, but to be honest, the internet at large does that about basically everything.

      But yeah, I’d welcome more eyes on gaming addiction. Just because someone is looking at the negative effects games taken to grand excess may have does not do anything to harm the industry or culture built around it. I wouldn’t estimate that there’s going to be all too much different to gaming addiction than the standard behavioral addiction, but it is still definitely worth the review. And the more we know about it, the better we’ll be at handling our chosen medium.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Hysteria breeds hysteria, I suppose.

        I wholeheartedly agree. Looking at something with a critical eye does not mean you don’t like it, in my opinion. It means you respect it enough to want it to be the best it can be. I don’t think there’s going to be much change, either, but if there *is* information, it’s definitely worth being found.

        Liked by 1 person

    2. These people *do* need to chill. I know it’s hard when one’s hobby (or something about oneself) has been dismissed or made fun of, only to then be asked to accept more criticism, even if this time it’s a little more founded, but unfortunately that only hinders progress sometimes. There have definitely been more cases of online gaming being more of a problem than single-playing (or otherwise offline) gaming, and I think that folks’ behaviors can show that. Objectivity is definitely the key word.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I recommend these people have a game, or character, that is very very special to them be constantly torn apart and made fun of by the entire internet. They will either learn to accept criticism, or lose their damn minds… 😛

        Liked by 1 person

  5. I think I said this on twitter to another post on this, but in 7 years of counseling I have I’ve dealt with probably a few hundred where their behavior around video games created problems, though in all those cases I would argue that was a decision making was the issue, video games just happened to be the choice.

    I’ve only seen one person who could maybe qualify for a disorder that was specifically rated to his gaming. It had a definitive mood altering effect on him, he lost rationality if there was anything but the strictest boundaries around it, and it severely impacted his functioning. He could not self-regulate it. It was like an addict or a compulsive behavioral addiction claiming, “I can totally handle it” because he could refrain for a week, but then would completely regress and throw regressive fits if he was not allowed to play progressively more and more video game time.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. You did! I remember. I think that’s very key – I have, erm, done some unhealthy things to cope with problems in the past (one of which was excessively gaming), but that didn’t make me any sort of addict. The underlying problem went away, and so did the negative behavior. But I personally wonder if it’s worth noting *what* is the person’s “drug” of choice, in those cases?

      I also wonder if, in your experience, the more serious gaming problems were with online games or MMOs, versus offline or single-player games? I didn’t get into that too much here because the ICD doesn’t specify (and the DSM does, so maybe I’ll be revisiting later), and honestly I need to do a little more research into the internet gaming vs. gaming disorders. But I’d be interested in hearing your thoughts on the matter!


      1. So, most of my experience (6 of the 7 years) was with residential treatment. The facility highly controlled video games, so my experience professionally is limited. That said, the one person I mentioned had zero impact as to what the game was. If it was Minecraft, a simple online game such as Bewjelled, or any other game it had a dramatic effect regardless of type.

        On the other hand it intuitively makes sense that open-ended games like MMOs, or games with high ability to repeat like MOBAs or Battle Arenas would seem to be much more likely to feed into longer term problems. After all, even if you are an obsessive completionist, the biggest of RPGs ultimately has an end. PUBG and World of Warcraft only end when you stop. There’s always one more thing to get, one more battle to fight, etc.

        However, just because something intuitively makes sense does not mean it’s true. Similar to how when highway speeds were raised and accidents went down, what we anticipate will happen and what does sometimes do not match up at all. So, no clue what the actual experience is.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. Very interesting! Thank you 🙂

          I’ve unfortunately read anecdotal stories of folks really getting themselves into trouble with MMOs, even committing suicide because of the effect the game had on them/their life. I’d be personally interested in seeing some more objective data on this. Like you mentioned, it seems like there could potentially be a problem, but it might not be as widespread as needing its own diagnosis, or a host of many other possibilities.


  6. I had initial concerns, but only before reading the terms. It’s clear that there’s more to what qualifies as addiction than just liking to play video games. To me, it means that the individual struggles with regulating their behavior, like someone who fails to call into work because they got stuck playing a game. Someone who loses their job because of video games. Someone that fails to eat, sleep, or bathe because they can’t stop playing.

    That in itself makes for a small group that would fit into that diagnosis. Certainly not the huge, sweeping generalizations which will doom gamers the world over though.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. YES this is exactly what the diagnosis is for. The media (who are not addiction or psych experts) is doing what they do best: selling a story by any means necessary.

      But for the people who flunk out of school, lost jobs, or lose large sums of money, it’s definitely a real problem, like you said. And like anything that is an addiction, it really only affects a small percentage of users. Not everyone who drinks alcohol is an alcoholic, after all.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s