Toxic Love: Men, Women, and Games

It’s been a while since I’ve written about the quagmire that is gender and gaming. But we’re winding up for another set of posts on the topic, and what better way to ease into this topic than talking about toxic masculinity and toxic femininity/feminism?

The Issue of Non-Issue

What fascinates me about this particular issue is that because sexim is not blatantly overt in the general population, and gender roles have changed slightly, many people are content to dust off their hands, say, “Problem solved!” and give a side-eye to those who continue to question whether the solutions are as absolute as some people like to claim.

So, in this particular article, we will be defining masculinity and femininity, and talking about when these constructs are taken to their unyielding extreme and begin to not work in harmony, but strike at the foundations of a cohesive society.

A Few Definitions

When I posted about this topic on Patreon, I had a nice discussion with LightningEllen about toxic masculinity and toxic femininity. What was most striking to me was that there was no real definition to the latter and, indeed, the two of us had wildly different ideas as to what these terms actually entailed.

samuel-johnson

So, to make sure we are on the same page, for the following article, I will be defining the above terms thus:

Masculinity: physical, emotional, and behavioral traits traditionally associated with men. These characteristics are active (that is, the person is taking an active role in social contexts), and are opposite to the feminine.

Toxic masculinity: a state of being wherein masculine traits are exhibited to a point that they are harmful or oppressive to the person exhibiting the traits, and/or to those around them. A man must never show weakness in any capacity: physically, mentally, or emotionally.

Image result for toxic masculinity
NO NO NO NO NO

Femininity: physical, emotional, and behavioral traits traditionally associated with women. These characteristics are passive (that is, the person is being acted upon by other forces, such as the masculine), and are opposite to the masculine.

Toxic femininity: A sub-group under toxic masculinity. It is a state of being wherein feminine traits are exhibited to a point that they are harmful or oppressive to the person exhibiting the traits, and/or to those around them. Tends toward women being passive and being acted upon, rather than taking action.

 

Image result for 50s housewife
Do you know how hard it is to find a picture for toxic femininity? That’s how passive it is.

Feminism: a social idea that the genders should be equal in social, cultural, and vocational positions.

Image result for toxic femininity
Yay! Yes!

Third-wave feminism: Extreme, revenge-filled feminism. It is a set of ideas that proclaims women to be superior to men, or otherwise labels men as “the other” or, worse, “the enemy.” Also sees women who want to be stay-at-home moms, believe that men should be the breadwinners, and/or who simply don’t believe men are The Enemy, as “the enemy.”

Image result for feminazi
NO NO NO NO NO

When It’s Okay, and When It’s Toxic

I have a radical idea: masculine and feminine are actually made to complement each other. The strength, courage, independence, violence, and assertiveness are balanced by empathy, gentleness, and sensitivity. There is nothing inherently wrong or toxic about any of these characteristics, and having a balance of both is – or should be – considered ideal.

Image result for yin yang
This is actually a real idea!!!

When this begins to crumble is when they are taken to their extreme, to the point where a person is expected to have all of Column A without ever demonstrating characteristics from Column B. The characteristics in the above paragraph are some examples of masculinity and femininity, but within society there are many other expectations that pressure men and women to think, act, and feel in particular ways.

When all of these things become toxic, it’s because a person has adopted these characteristics, but then also attempts to take away another person’s autonomy because of them. This can either be internal or external. For instance, a man might feel pressure to not “show weakness” by crying at a movie, or he might think it’s okay to talk over women because he has been raised to always be assertive with his ideas. A woman might feel pressure to wear makeup and be appealing for “the male gaze,” or she might think it’s okay to wield her emotions like a weapon.*

 

Notice something here. These are both harmful, please make no mistake about that. But when one group is always the one “acting” and one group is always being “acted upon,” it not only harmful to the individual, but can be harmful to the group as a whole.

A Brief Digression

But Athena, some of you might wonder. If everyone just stayed in their gender roles, this wouldn’t be a problem. You said yourself that masculine and feminine are complements of each other!

The hammer and nail argument, yes. In Japan, there is a saying that roughly translates to, the nal that sticks out gets hammered down. Sure, yes, if everyone sat down, shut up, and continued on, yep this wouldn’t be a problem. We’d all be squeezed into our tiny little cookie cutters, whether or not we really fix, and go through our lives peacefully, if not incredibly unhappy.

Image result for hammer and nail
Everyone wants to be the hammer, and doesn’t think about who is the nail.

Let’s face it, people. We’re all affected by The Patriarchy, but because within the confines of the masculine and feminine gender roles one is always active and one is always acted upon, some issues are a lot more immediately or externally harmful, and some are more internally harmful. As a blunt example: men can take what they want, when they want it, but if a woman wants something for herself (which is outside of her “gender role”) she must subvert the system and act in a manipulative way, since being assertive isn’t a socially acceptable option.

This causes men to be angry at how deceptive “women as an entire gender” are, and then further results in women being expected/forced to deal with/deflect/defuse their anger. And because men are supposed to be dominant, there is no room for listening to “her side” of the story. Man must stay in control, because men are always supposed to be in control.*

Two sides of one horrendous, ridiculous coin.

mgs2-our-beloved-monsters

Games and This Whole Mess

Thank the Maker, we’re finally talking about video games.

I’m not even going to attempt to dive into the cesspool that is toxic masculine behavior online or within gaming communities, with gatekeeping, slurs, and general horribleness happening from men to women and men to other men. But I would like to talk briefly about the roles that games play in all of this.

For those of you who have been hanging around a while, you’ll know that I am a big believer in representation mattering in games. We emulate behaviors that we observe, whether that is in real life or on a screen. We emulate behaviors more strongly when we have an inherent disposition toward an idea (i.e., it’s “in our nature” or “our personality”), but we can also absorb as true the ideas that are presented to us most consistently, even at a subconscious level.

Image result for nature and nurture

Remember a long time ago when I asked you to play a game with me? And then we talked about what the game was all about? Seeing how certain characters are portrayed, as you guys know, contributes to how a person sees themselves. Yes, it is possible to rage against the machine, as it were, but when operating within a social group, we are expected to fulfill the norms and expectations put on us, with a slight degree of variation (again decided by society) being acceptable. Break all the norms and expectations, and the group at large will not be accepting of your behavior.

How these norms are developed is far outside of the scope of this article, but suffice it to say that once the norms are developed, it is up to the member of society and the media of that society to maintain and enforce those norms. Such is the state of video games and the video game community.

On the video game front, we are given men and women who fall into masculine and feminine boxes. Solid Snake and Cole McGrath, for instance, are as comic-book-hero-esque as characters can get, and are examples of what A Man should be: powerful, aggressive, lacking any sort of emotional display other than outrage or anger (or, if they do, it’s not long before the more “acceptable” emotions come back, i.e., sadness turning immediately into anger). Compare to Raiden from Metal Gear Solid 2: still pretty powerful, still pretty aggressive, but also has a girlfriend that he loves and is emotionally hurt by. And fans called him a pansy.

Image result for men women and games
Some men might not see this as a problem, though.

Let’s take two queens of gaming, Princess Zelda and Princess Peach. Avoiding stereotypical language, Peach is the woman who waits at home for Mario, baking him cakes and offering him kisses as rewards for doing things for her. She passively waits for Mario to actively go and be the hero. Princess Zelda (with the exception of possibly Wind Waker and Breath of the Wild) is demure, and quiet, although enjoys the slight deviation from the norm by being wise and even taking a slightly more active role in Twilight Princess when she actually holds a sword for a few seconds and fires some arrows alongside Link, but sufficiently makes up for this by being largely absent as Link saves the world.

Compare this to another famous woman in gaming, Lara Croft, who started off as a female Indiana Jones and then was somehow twisted into gaming’s biggest sex symbol, because it wasn’t enough that she was smart and capable and the primary character like her male counterparts: she had to be appealing to men.

Image result for lara croft
Notice as she became more realistic (in many ways), her body proportions changed.

Which brings me to the actual point of this article: the effects these games can have on a person. Video games enforce (for the most part) the ideals and values of the society, and so the societal pressure on a man to never be weak, and a woman to always be second, is reflected in that.

Why Is This Bad, and Why Aren’t You Talking About Games Yet?

I’ll be blunt: toxic masculinity is bad because it hurts people. It forces men into a role that is not sustainable, at least without compromising other people. How can one always be in control, unless one takes control away from another person? How can one always be the strongest, if the other person isn’t expected to be weaker? How can one always be right, unless other thoughts and opinions are silenced or belittled? How can one be expected to not emote, and yet be expected to be so compassionate as to risk life and limb for another person? How can a person help bring another person into being, and then think it’s okay to say that they are “babysitting” their own children, when in reality they are parenting?

Image result for men and children
Aw…

What about toxic femininity? Well, that hurts people, too, but in a more reactive (versus active) way. How can one succeed in a job that requires you to self-advocate, when one is insulted for being assertive? How can one exert independence, when one is expected to sit quietly and wait for a man to come along? How can one ever hope for equality, when there is one superior and one inferior gender?

Image result for anti women's rights

While some folks may disagree, media is so important. To be clear, no, video games, movies, books, and the like don’t need to validate my existence and I’m not asking society for permission to exist. But I’m asking media to have balance, to offer a window into worlds that we might not otherwise see, to offer a window into worlds that could be, if only we tried hard enough.

Because it matters.

Studies have shown that, when men are exposed to video games that glorify the “masculine” stereotype and systematically supports the oppression of women, those men have a greater tolerance for real-life violence against women. The same effects were not seen when women played these same games.

Related image

So what does that mean? That means that society primes men to think a certain way (they are “masculine”), and media reinforces that “masculine” means never being feminine, and that harming those who are “the feminine” is okay. Rewarded, even. So that’s what one learns.

And thus we have reinforced toxic masculinity.

Video games that portray men being violent toward women causes men to be more tolerant toward violence against women.

I… shouldn’t have to say anything after that.

Like violence before this, being subjected to certain themes in certain games can make you more tolerant of them. Maybe there isn’t causation between playing a video game and actually sexually harassing a woman, but seeing images of men dominating women reinforces that men are the ones who do the acting, and women are the ones who are acted upon. In these games, men are always in control and always exerting power over others. And the man doing the acting is the hero, and the woman being acted upon is just that: scenery, waiting for a man to show up and give her existence meaning.

Image result for princess peach
Out of context game picture is out of context.

So, no, while playing a Grand Theft Auto game isn’t going to turn you into a sexual predator, it might make a man feel entitled to a woman, or reinforce that respecting her integrity or right to an existence outside of your gaze/pleasure is not necessary. And that’s a problem.

But #NotAllMen!

Yes. Not all men, and not all games. Men are not, I’ll remind all of you sharpening your pitchforks, the enemy here. No one is the enemy here. No one is an enemy. Say it with me: no one is an enemy.

Image result for world peace

In recent years, games have begun to explore more realistic portrayals of women, and that’s great. I’m certainly not saying that power fantasies are inherently bad; after all, who doesn’t want to be a superhero all the time? And I’m not saying that no video game should ever objectify or subjugate anyone else. I’m not completely out-of-touch: being able to exert power over someone else makes a person feel powerful. You can’t always do it in the physical world, so sure, put it in a game. But also realize that what you put in a game is going to affect how the person interacts with their actual, real world.

So men may feel pressure to never feel anything beyond angry, to “man up” and fulfill any number of stereotypes that can, at the end of the day, oppress their true natures. And women might feel pressured to stay a step behind men, keeping their heads down and their voices soft, waiting to be called on. Society says it, games show it, and that’s the only possibility that is ever given.

Image result for stern arms crossed

What I advocate, as per usual, is the inclusion of games into our collective minds that have well-written characters. Yes, there is a whole social brick wall that we’re going to run into, because men have been led to believe they can’t show emotions, and so will not want to play as a “sissy,” as we saw with poor Raiden. Women have been led to believe that being assertive is being a bitch, or that women cannot take care of themselves, and so may instead prefer playing as a “strong” man instead of a “strong” woman.

We’re all stuck in the matrix, folks. We are all constantly under pressure by society to fit into the little boxes it provides to us, all little pegs waiting to be hammered down into our respective holes, whether or not we actually fit in them.

I love video games. I love that they can open the door to new realities and experiences that aren’t possible in the physical world.

I love that they can open doors into worlds that are possible, and that could be, if only…

I love that games can hold up a mirror and say, here’s what is.

And I really love that they are important enough to us that they can influence our behavior.

…We just always need to be aware of the type of person we are being influenced to be.

What are your thoughts on toxic masculinity/femininity? How can this be translated into our real-world communities? Or is this not a problem at all? Let me know in the comments!

Thanks for stopping by, and I’ll see you soon!
~ Athena

Do you like what you’ve read? Become a revered Aegis of AmbiGaming and show your support for small creators and for video games as a serious, viable, and relevant medium!

For more reading on games and masculinity:

Fox, J., & Tang, W.Y. (2013). Sexism in online video games: The role of conformity to masculine norms and social dominance orientation. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 314-320. Linked here: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/be6b/69d4062dd20d35728ff2e515048b1dcd5f5e.pdf

Dill, K.E., Brown, B.P., & Collins, M.A. (2007). Effects of exposure to sex-stereotyped video game characters on tolerance of sexual harassment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1402-1408.

http://www.marissabellino.com/uploads/7/6/6/1/7661682/content_analysis_video_games_and_gender.pdf


13 thoughts on “Toxic Love: Men, Women, and Games

  1. Hi Athena, this was a really interesting and thoughtful article. I very much appreciate the balanced approach to both masculine and feminine toxicity, and completely agree that the media we consume does have an impact on how we act. I think we may see a paradigm shift in the nearish future with more and more people born of the current generation designing games. The media of the last 10 years have had the most demanding audience I have ever known, demanding of realism and fidelity and I have to assume folk from the generation then becoming the producers themselves will remember what they demanded and produce exactly that.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi John! Thank you; I’m glad you like the article. They are definitely two sides to the same coin, and both very harmful. I agree that we will see (and are seeing) a paradigm shift, and I will be very excited for the day that this point has become a complete non-issue! You’re right that the last 10 years have been pretty… demanding is a good word for it, in regards to what we want from our media. I like to hope that we’re just seeing growing pains now 🙂

      Like

  2. Good insights! It’s such a tricky topic to cover because everyone wants to get up in arms, but I think you did a good job. Hopefully we as gamers can continue to build good communities and support the kinds of characters that we want to see more of. For me that means more diverse perspectives and more inclusivity. One can dream anyhow 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks! Yeah, it’s a tough one, but it’s unfortunately one we need to still keep talking about. I’d like to hope that we can keep expanding the community of gamers that “leads from the front” in regards to kind, accepting behavior, so we can continue our march toward acceptance and equality!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Thanks for giving us such a balanced view, Athena. Nobody is an enemy and to achieve true equality, everybody has to be perceived as a true equal. Imagine what seven-billion people could achieve if we all had a little more respect for one another.

    Sometimes it’s important to take a step back to see what’s been achieved, even when there’s still so far to go. As highlighted by yourself and John in the comments above, I think we’re really starting to see a shift: back in the day I had only Lara Croft and Chun-Li as female role models in games, whereas we now have access to a much wider range of diverse, strong and inspiring characters.

    Perhaps one day this will be the norm… I hope I’m still around to see it.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you! I’m glad you enjoyed reading it. Yes, things are definitely changing, and for the more accepting/better. And I agree that as long as we keep trying (or start trying, in some cases) to not see The Other as The Enemy, we’ll be okay. One day sooner rather than later, with a little luck…

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Ah, this is so good! As I’ve gotten older and learned more of these things, I’ve been able to look back and see how toxic masculinity had a negative impact on my emotional health during my teen years – and also kind of made me a crappy person to be around. I want to make sure my son understands masculine behavior in a healthier way than I did, and that he is able to balance those qualities out with softness and empathy. I think if we’re going to change the big-picture stuff (like the gaming toxicity cesspool you mentioned), helping the next generation to get this is a good tool to have in our box!

    Liked by 1 person

  5. A very informative and insightful post. I have read it a few times out of fear of missing something! I really liked your definition of toxic femininity, most definitions I have seen are either kilometric or tend to go in circles. Also, your discussion about representation reminded me of something I read recently, the gist of it was “if I can see it, I can be it”. Some people do not need role-models or validation, but for others entertainment-oriented media is the most accessible way to be exposed to images that disrupt or criticise societal expectations of gender.

    The definition of third-wave feminism is the one thing in this article I can’t agree with. There are a lot of things about third-wave feminism that can be criticised, but I just don’t think that definition can apply to it as a social movement. I feel like a pedant for saying that, but it doesn’t seem fair to define it as a group of man-hating shrieks.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. “If I can see it, I can be it” is a really great way of putting it. The idea of “I can do it without media” is one that I strongly disagree with, because “I got mine” is not how a society should or can function, in my opinion.

      That’s fair. It’s an age of feminism, but whereas the first two waves seemed to have solid beacons, it seems that the third wave focused on “individuality” and allowing others to define feminism as suited them, which, to my experience, resulted in people like me being labeled as “not really a feminist” for whatever reason du jour. But you’re right that an entire movement can’t be defined as man-hating or woman-not-like-them-hating.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. All credit for that awesome way of putting it goes to Las de Sistemas (a women in tech NGO). I couldn’t remember their name before.

        Yeah, I get where you are coming from. I have gotten into a few “but are you really a feminist if you believe [x]” arguments myself, and rarely are they fun. At any rate, I am glad I did not offend you with my previous comment, because I just re-read what I wrote and yikes!

        Liked by 1 person

        1. No worries. No tone was detected, and differing viewpoints are always welcome! It’s definitely more art than science, and anything that’s open for interpretation will cause some ruffled feathers!

          Las de Sistemas sounds like a very insightful bunch.

          Like

  6. It’s pretty asinine to try an enforce behavioral standards that are supposed to apply to a full half of the human population in the first place. All the personalities, cultures, backgrounds and just general variable people involved, and still we try to fit them into these little boxes in which we’re comfortable.

    Media does absolutely play a part in enforcing this. I won’t say it’s the only or even biggest part of it, nor can changing it alone be the way out of this phenomenon, but it definitely plays a part in it. And it cuts both ways. It sets defined roles in place for a whole group of people that don’t fit them, instills in men that they’re worth less if they don’t have a personality type that fits those expectations while communicating to women they’re out of place for the same things, and tries to fit everyone into nice neat little boxes. And what’s particularly horrible is that this just seems to be a natural state for people. Even if the specific roles may change, you can still see this imposition of specific roles on specific come through as you start looking at organizations where women are the primary holders of power, other cultures, subcultures, ethnic groups, companies, whatever. Label people, put them in boxes, and if they don’t fit they’re subject to stigmatization.

    So yeah, it’s awful, people do it all the time, and most are completely blind to what they do about it, especially when it’s not falling into one of those boxes that are so often talked about. It’s going to take more than changing media alone to get around that. But that’s an ingredient in the total solution.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Absolutely.Unfortunately this is a gaming blog so I try to keep things limited to games or the gaming community, but you’re right that although media plays a role, it’s not a big one, but it still counts.

      I throw terms and labels around a lot here, but one of the worst things a person or a people can do is label themselves or others. It immediately reinforced the “us vs. them” that is already inherent, and, no matter who is in power (except for me of course), there are going to be boxes being forced on people. It’s ridiculous.

      Hopefully, we are still moving in the right direction… drops in a bucket will eventually fill it up, after all.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s